<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Genesis in Games</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/</link>
	<description>For those interested in the business of making great video games. Entrepreneurial spirit a must.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Edery</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3905</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Edery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/#comment-3905</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention the potion! Thanks for the reminder. Yes, it seems more promotional than what I&#039;m suggesting. A slightly better example is &quot;Bertie Bott&#039;s Every-Flavor Beans&quot; from &lt;i&gt;Harry Potter&lt;/i&gt; -- Hasbro has been selling a real-world version for a while now, and it&#039;s very successful. They even make a &quot;dirt&quot; flavored bean, and apparently, it&#039;s pretty gross. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention the potion! Thanks for the reminder. Yes, it seems more promotional than what I&#8217;m suggesting. A slightly better example is &#8220;Bertie Bott&#8217;s Every-Flavor Beans&#8221; from <i>Harry Potter</i> &#8212; Hasbro has been selling a real-world version for a while now, and it&#8217;s very successful. They even make a &#8220;dirt&#8221; flavored bean, and apparently, it&#8217;s pretty gross. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breath</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>breath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/2006/06/brand-genesis-in-games-2/#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>Hah, I assume you know about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gaming/a-real-final-fantasy-potion-140427.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Final Fantasy Potion&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s similar to what you&#039;re talking about, though I guess it&#039;s more of a promotional item.

Here&#039;s my prediction:  execs will be so scared of interactivity that you won&#039;t see the sort of thing that you&#039;re proposing for Ford in SL for a long time.  What will be more common initially is products created in conjunction with a game (much like how Pokemon toys/game/TV show were developed in tandem).  I mean, seriously, people just can&#039;t get their heads around iterative design of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, I assume you know about the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gaming/a-real-final-fantasy-potion-140427.php" rel="nofollow">Final Fantasy Potion</a>. It&#8217;s similar to what you&#8217;re talking about, though I guess it&#8217;s more of a promotional item.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my prediction:  execs will be so scared of interactivity that you won&#8217;t see the sort of thing that you&#8217;re proposing for Ford in SL for a long time.  What will be more common initially is products created in conjunction with a game (much like how Pokemon toys/game/TV show were developed in tandem).  I mean, seriously, people just can&#8217;t get their heads around iterative design of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

