<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is $300 Magical?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edery.org/2009/05/956/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/05/956/</link>
	<description>For those interested in the business of making great video games. Entrepreneurial spirit a must.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Edery</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/05/956/comment-page-1/#comment-254529</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Edery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=956#comment-254529</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that there are certain price thresholds that can make a difference for social and psychological reasons; I just object to citing those thresholds in absence of all the other factors that contribute to a purchase decision. 

RE: the Wii&#039;s price: no question that it played a significant role in the Wii&#039;s success. And there&#039;s no question that the PS3&#039;s launch price played the *primary* role in its early failures. But, to quote Chris Hecker, nobody was going to pay $250 for &quot;two Gamecubes duct taped together&quot; unless the timing was right, the interface was novel and accessible, and the marketing was brilliant. 

Sony&#039;s working on the price. Their timing, marketing, and unique feature prop could use some work, too. But again, I don&#039;t know what they&#039;re cooking for E3...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that there are certain price thresholds that can make a difference for social and psychological reasons; I just object to citing those thresholds in absence of all the other factors that contribute to a purchase decision. </p>
<p>RE: the Wii&#8217;s price: no question that it played a significant role in the Wii&#8217;s success. And there&#8217;s no question that the PS3&#8242;s launch price played the *primary* role in its early failures. But, to quote Chris Hecker, nobody was going to pay $250 for &#8220;two Gamecubes duct taped together&#8221; unless the timing was right, the interface was novel and accessible, and the marketing was brilliant. </p>
<p>Sony&#8217;s working on the price. Their timing, marketing, and unique feature prop could use some work, too. But again, I don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re cooking for E3&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Pallister</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/05/956/comment-page-1/#comment-254504</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Pallister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=956#comment-254504</guid>
		<description>I remember seeing a market research study (a fairly credible one IIRC, but I can&#039;t find it now to save my life) that showed that $200 was a significant threshold because it was a the point at which purchases didn&#039;t require spousal approval. Interestingly, this threshold didn&#039;t change whether the family income was $50k or 150k/yr. Not sure whether recession changes it or not.

I&#039;ve long believed that the lower price point was a significant factor in the Wii&#039;s dominance. And the press seems to not want to even look at that. It&#039;s all about the controller and retiree virtual bowling, etc.

I just think that when you look at console + a couple games + accessories, a 360 is a couple hundred bucks more than a Wii and a PS3 is more than that. If I&#039;m a parent buying for my kid, well, that&#039;s a lot of scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember seeing a market research study (a fairly credible one IIRC, but I can&#8217;t find it now to save my life) that showed that $200 was a significant threshold because it was a the point at which purchases didn&#8217;t require spousal approval. Interestingly, this threshold didn&#8217;t change whether the family income was $50k or 150k/yr. Not sure whether recession changes it or not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long believed that the lower price point was a significant factor in the Wii&#8217;s dominance. And the press seems to not want to even look at that. It&#8217;s all about the controller and retiree virtual bowling, etc.</p>
<p>I just think that when you look at console + a couple games + accessories, a 360 is a couple hundred bucks more than a Wii and a PS3 is more than that. If I&#8217;m a parent buying for my kid, well, that&#8217;s a lot of scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

