<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On EA&#8217;s Acquisition of Playfish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/</link>
	<description>For those interested in the business of making great video games. Entrepreneurial spirit a must.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Edery</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/comment-page-1/#comment-269348</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Edery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=1284#comment-269348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be surprised if EA didn&#039;t intend to leverage its IP via Playfish, but I&#039;d personally guess that&#039;s a strong secondary reason for the purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if EA didn&#8217;t intend to leverage its IP via Playfish, but I&#8217;d personally guess that&#8217;s a strong secondary reason for the purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/comment-page-1/#comment-269344</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=1284#comment-269344</guid>
		<description>All good points.  Do you think having EA&#039;s legal expertise and/or working on ironclad IP will change the dynamic for Playfish?  Or is this really just a numbers game for active user base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good points.  Do you think having EA&#8217;s legal expertise and/or working on ironclad IP will change the dynamic for Playfish?  Or is this really just a numbers game for active user base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/comment-page-1/#comment-269119</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=1284#comment-269119</guid>
		<description>Somehow this reminds me of all the people buying AMZN after it gapped up to all-time highs at the peak of a rally driven by government funny-money, you know what I mean? Its like paying a quarter billion to avoid having to do your homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow this reminds me of all the people buying AMZN after it gapped up to all-time highs at the peak of a rally driven by government funny-money, you know what I mean? Its like paying a quarter billion to avoid having to do your homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.edery.org/2009/11/on-eas-acquisition-of-playfish/comment-page-1/#comment-269116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edery.org/?p=1284#comment-269116</guid>
		<description>I blogged a short note about this here:

http://www.kimpallister.com/2009/11/ea-buys-playfish.html

Yes, in short they bought the IP, the user base, the revenue stream, and the expertise.

In fact, the structure of the acquisition hints at the above. The earnout is partly to retain talent and partly to make sure they hit the revenue numbers ongoing (which is in turn related to retaining the user base, etc). The stock part of the deal is related to retaining talent.

As to whether they overpaid or not, we&#039;ll never really know. Whether it turns out to be a successful piece of their business or not is immaterial to whether they overpaid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged a short note about this here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kimpallister.com/2009/11/ea-buys-playfish.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kimpallister.com/2009/11/ea-buys-playfish.html</a></p>
<p>Yes, in short they bought the IP, the user base, the revenue stream, and the expertise.</p>
<p>In fact, the structure of the acquisition hints at the above. The earnout is partly to retain talent and partly to make sure they hit the revenue numbers ongoing (which is in turn related to retaining the user base, etc). The stock part of the deal is related to retaining talent.</p>
<p>As to whether they overpaid or not, we&#8217;ll never really know. Whether it turns out to be a successful piece of their business or not is immaterial to whether they overpaid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

