Daily Archives: April 3, 2006

Articles of Interest

  • Very interesting series of events over at Next Generation. A few days ago, they reported on the development of a mobile “workplace shooter” (i.e. kill your co-workers.) The next day, they published an op-ed by MIT’s own Chris Weaver, who took the publisher to task for “social irresponsibility”. That, and a few other opinion pieces, caused the publisher (Alten8) to kill the title (apologies for the pun) only a day later. A rather remarkable example of the self-policing that has now begun to occur in the video game industry.
  • Microsoft will soon “re-launch” the Xbox 360 in Japan. No word yet on whether this means new pricing/bundles, or just a new ad campaign.
  • Not games: I think it’s important to understand how pervasive access to next-gen technology has impacted South Korean society; it might give us a glimpse into what life could be like in the US and Europe someday. Anyway, interesting article on S. Korean robots, politics, and blogs in the New York Times.
  • I’m always interested to see how the gaming community will react when a potential imposter (i.e. stealth paid marketing person) gets fingered on a forum, by a comic, etc. Or in this case, at Digg.com. Check out the comment thread. Wish there was some way of quantifying the damage…

Wisdom of Crowds

If you haven’t already read it, I’d like to direct your attention to an absolutely fantastic book called Wisdom of Crowds, by James Surowiecki. In it, Surowiecki argues that the decision-making and predictive power of diverse groups of people greatly exceeds that of most individual “experts”. The book is remarkably comprehensive and convincing, and the case studies in it will inspire and amaze you.

Wisdom of Crowds opens with a nice example: 800 people at a livestock exhibition participated in a contest to guess the weight of a live ox (on display) after slaughter and preparation. Some of the 800 were butchers and so-forth; people who should make a good guess. Many contestants were ordinary people with less “relevant” knowledge. But no expert within the competing pool beat the average guess of the group as a whole, which came within one pound of the true weight (1,197 lbs instead of 1,198).

Continue reading